Cultural Heritage and Social Responsibility

Major: Museum, Monument Protection Activity and Cultural Tourism
Code of subject: 6.027.03.O.002
Credits: 5.00
Department: History of Ukraine and Ethnic Communication
Lecturer: PhD Yuliia Kurdyna
Semester: 1 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Мета вивчення дисципліни: consider the phenomenon of social responsibility in the field of cultural heritage; trace the peculiarities of the implementation of this responsibility by the state, business, local communities and individuals; show ways and opportunities that can become cases for future specialists in the field of cultural heritage. This discipline stimulates students' development of critical thinking and analysis and adequate evaluation of historical and cultural information, motivation and self-identification of the individual based on knowledge of cultural heritage.
Завдання: general competences: -The ability to determine and understand the influence of social, cultural, political and ethical contexts, conditions and factors in professional activity. professional competences: -The ability to act in a socially responsible and conscious manner in accordance with the understanding of the development trends of the museum, monument preservation and tourism industries.
Learning outcomes: • Ability to demonstrate an understanding of the impact of socio-cultural and political factors on the state and development of the professional field; • Effectively interact with the public in the context of actualization of tangible and intangible cultural heritage; • Ability to treat the work performed and the goal responsibly in compliance with the requirements of professional ethics;
Required prior and related subjects: Fundamentals of professional communication Сultural heritage and sustainable development of society
Summary of the subject: The protection of cultural heritage remains the most problematic area of activity in the field of culture, since its objects are the most vulnerable to external destructive influences and quite often are at the intersection of the opposing interests of the state as the main subject of cultural heritage preservation, and interested public organizations and movements. on the one hand, and subjects of economic activity - on the other. Nevertheless, such a phenomenon as social responsibility has been closely related to the preservation and popularization of cultural heritage for decades. If in the past this was manifested in the patronage and legislation of individual states, then in the XXI century. the implementation of social responsibility has expanded thanks to public institutions, various grant programs, activities of individual institutions or activists. Therefore, in the process of studying the academic discipline, various manifestations of social responsibility will be considered: state, corporate and personal - in historical retrospect and with concrete examples; the importance of social responsibility for ensuring the sustainable development of society will be discussed; the possibilities of museums and public historians in this field will be analyzed. In addition, students were asked to complete an individual research task as a practical embodiment of social responsibility in the preservation of cultural heritage. Докладніше про цей текст оригіналуЩоб дізнатися більше про переклад, введіть текст оригіналу Надіслати відгук Бічні панелі
Опис: Theoretical principles of Theoretical principles of social responsibility; Personal, corporate and state social responsibility in the field of cultural heritage; UNESCO and cultural heritage; Intangible cultural heritage; Social responsibility and digital cultural heritage; Museums and their role in preserving and promoting cultural heritage; Public history as a tool for the protection of historical and cultural monuments.; Personal, corporate and state social responsibility in the field of cultural heritage; UNESCO and cultural heritage; Intangible cultural heritage; Social responsibility and digital cultural heritage; Museums and their role in preserving and promoting cultural heritage; Public history as a tool for the protection of historical and cultural monuments.
Assessment methods and criteria: 100-point rating: current control - 40 points (polls. presentations, oral and written answers); final control - 60 points (exam)
Критерії оцінювання результатів навчання: 100-point rating by the system: current control – 45 points (40 for class answers, 5 for presentation); final control – 55 points (exam). Work in classes: Report - a maximum of 3 points. Criteria: - quality of knowledge – its completeness, depth, flexibility, systematicity, strength; - speech culture (literacy, logic and sequence of presentation); - the level of meaningfulness of knowledge - the ability to formulate independent evaluation judgments and theoretical conclusions. Reviewing, opposing in class - a maximum of 2 points (ability to oppose and review; ability to argue one's own judgments and conclusions during a scientific discussion). Presentation of the project on updating little-known objects of cultural heritage - 5 points. Criteria: – ability to analyze, compare, classify and summarize material; - general design of the visual series; - a creative approach to presenting information; - logicality and sequence of presentation of the material; - attracting a sufficient number of sources of information.
Порядок та критерії виставляння балів та оцінок: 100–88 points – (“excellent”) is awarded for a high level of knowledge (some inaccuracies are allowed) of the educational material of the component contained in the main and additional recommended literary sources, the ability to analyze the phenomena being studied in their interrelationship and development, clearly, succinctly, logically, consistently answer the questions, the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 87–71 points – (“good”) is awarded for a generally correct understanding of the educational material of the component, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions posed, which, however, contain certain (insignificant) shortcomings, for the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical tasks; 70 – 50 points – (“satisfactory”) awarded for weak knowledge of the component’s educational material, inaccurate or poorly reasoned answers, with a violation of the sequence of presentation, for weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 49-26 points - ("not certified" with the possibility of retaking the semester control) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 25-00 points - ("unsatisfactory" with mandatory re-study) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to navigate when solving practical problems, ignorance of the main fundamental provisions.
Recommended books: 1.Економіка спадщини: посібник для малих громад / О.Федорович, К.Рубановський. ТОВ «Знати про Карпати». – Івано-Франківськ: ТОВ «Знати про Карпати», 2019. – 120 с. 2.Історично-культурна спадщина малих міст Західної України як об’єкт наукового аналізу: Монографія /За наук. ред. д.ф.н. проф. Довганя А.О. - Тернопіль, 2016. - 247с. 3.Культурна спадщина в контексті «Зводу пам’яток історії та культури України» / відп. Ред. Кот С.І. — К.: Інститут історії України, 2015. — 486 с. 4. Культурна спадщина і соціальна відповідальність: навчальний посібник / Ю.М. Курдина, О.М. Годованська, О.Б. Ганусин. – Львів: Видавництво «Новий Світ – 2000», 2022. – 200 с. 5.Культурна спадщина України: інноваційні підходи та сталий розвиток: Навчальний посібник / П. В. Вербицька, І. І. Гнідик, О. М. Годованська, Ю. М. Курдина, А. З. Салюк. Львів: Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2022. – 148 с. 6.Маленков Р. Світова спадщина ЮНЕСКО в Україні /Роман Маленков. – К.: Комора, 2021. – 240 с. 7.Сучасний сталий розвиток в сфері культури: зарубіжний досвід для України: монографія / за заг.ред. Н. М. Драгомирецької. – Одеса : ОРІДУ НАДУ, 2019. – 238 с. 8.Управління місцевою культурною спадщиною в Україні: огляд державної політики, джерел та моделей фінансування: Біла книга / упоряд. Л. Кривецька. – Львів: Лабораторія міського простору, 2019. – 55 с. 9.Andriukaitiene R., Vveinhardt J., Zukauskas P. Management Culture and Corporate Social Responsibility. – London: IntechOpen, 2018. – 433 pp. 10.Dallen J. T. Cultural Heritage and Tourism: An Introduction. - Bristol: Channel View Publications, 2020. – 576 s. 11. Starr F. Corporate Responsibility for Cultural Heritage: Conservation, Sustainable Development, and Corporate Reputation. – New York: Routledge, 2013 - 229 pp.
Уніфікований додаток: Lviv Polytechnic National University ensures the realization of the right of persons with disabilities to obtain higher education. Inclusive educational services are provided by the Service of accessibility to learning opportunities "Without restrictions", the purpose of which is to provide permanent individual support for the educational process of students with disabilities and chronic diseases. An important tool for the implementation of the inclusive educational policy at the University is the Program for improving the qualifications of scientific and pedagogical workers and educational and support staff in the field of social inclusion and inclusive education. Contact at: St. Karpinsky, 2/4, 1st floor, room 112 E-mail: nolimits@lpnu.ua Websites: https://lpnu.ua/nolimits https://lpnu.ua/integration
Академічна доброчесність: The policy regarding the academic integrity of the participants of the educational process is formed on the basis of compliance with the principles of academic integrity, taking into account the norms "Regulations on academic integrity at the Lviv Polytechnic National University" (approved by the academic council of the university on June 20, 2017, protocol No. 35).