Home/ Majors directory/Applied Mathematics/Quality of Higher Education (Internal Quality Assurance Systems)
Quality of Higher Education (Internal Quality Assurance Systems)
Major: Applied Mathematics
Code of subject: 8.113.00.M.029
Credits: 3.00
Department: Management and International Business
Lecturer: Professor of the Department of Management and International Entrepreneurship, Doctor of Economics, Assoc. Shulyar R.V.
Semester: 3 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Завдання: Tasks of the academic discipline:
? To form basic principles regarding educational policy in the field of quality of higher education.
? Compare the strengths of different approaches to quality assurance.
? Retransmit the theory of quality management to management practice in higher education
? Develop a priority plan of practical measures for higher education institutions regarding quality assurance.
? Project the international experience on the problems of the quality of higher education in Ukraine.
The study of an academic discipline involves the formation and development of students' competencies:
acquiring in-depth knowledge of the specialty (group of specialties) in which (which) the graduate student conducts research, in particular mastering the main concepts, understanding theoretical and practical problems, the history of development and the current state of scientific knowledge in the chosen specialty, mastering the terminology of the researched scientific direction;
mastering general scientific (philosophical) competences aimed at forming a systematic scientific outlook, professional ethics and a general cultural outlook;
acquisition of universal skills of a researcher, in particular oral and written presentation of the results of one's own scientific research in Ukrainian, application of modern information technologies in scientific activity, organization and conduct of training sessions, management of scientific projects and/or drafting proposals for financing scientific research, registration of intellectual property rights.
2.3. Learning outcomes according to educational programs and methods of their evaluation
As a result of studying the academic discipline, the student must be able to demonstrate the following learning outcomes:
1. To form and update the knowledge base for postgraduate students' understanding of the educational policy to ensure the quality of higher education.
2. Develop, on the basis of knowledge and skills, the ability to develop own comparisons and proposals for the implementation of best practices at the national and higher education level.
Learning outcomes: Learning outcomes Learning and teaching methods Methods of assessing the level of achievement of learning outcomes
To form and update the knowledge base for graduate students to understand the educational policy on ensuring the quality of higher education.
Lectures, practical classes - information-receptive method, reproductive method, heuristic method, problem presentation method, independent work - reproductive method, research method. Current control - execution and
defense of practical works, oral and frontal examination.
Develop, on the basis of knowledge and skills, the ability to develop own comparisons and proposals for the implementation of best practices at the national and higher education level.
Lectures and practical classes: information-receptive method; reproductive method; heuristic method; problem statement method. Independent work: reproductive method. Current and settlement control. Knowledge assessment methods: selective oral survey; speeches at seminars, tests, colloquium, assessment of activity, submitted proposals, original solutions, clarifications and definitions, etc. Assessment - written survey, test control
Required prior and related subjects: Professional pedagogy
Academic entrepreneurship
Pedagogical practice
Summary of the subject: The educational discipline allows graduate students to master the necessary material for practical and research work in the field of internal and external quality assurance of higher education.
Postgraduate students will receive theoretical and practical materials related to the formation and development of international experience in the context of the integration of Ukrainian higher education in the sense of ensuring its quality in the European educational space.
At lectures and practical (seminar) classes, graduate students will be exposed to the most important currents and practices in leading European countries. The skills of graduate students will be developed in terms of the projection of this experience on the Ukrainian practice of ensuring the quality of higher education. In addition to the national context and state policy in the field of quality, regulatory support of these processes, course participants will acquire key skills related to internal quality assurance of higher education in higher education institutions. A distinctive feature of the course materials is the used experience of preparation and participation of Ukrainian HEIs in international projects and the formation of internal systems for ensuring the quality of educational activities in HEIs based on this experience.
Опис: The educational discipline allows graduate students to master the necessary material for practical and research work in the field of internal and external quality assurance of higher education.
Postgraduate students will receive theoretical and practical materials related to the formation and development of international experience in the context of the integration of Ukrainian higher education in the sense of ensuring its quality in the European educational space.
At lectures and practical (seminar) classes, graduate students will be exposed to the most important currents and practices in leading European countries. The skills of graduate students will be developed in terms of the projection of this experience on the Ukrainian practice of ensuring the quality of higher education. In addition to the national context and state policy in the field of quality, regulatory support of these processes, course participants will acquire key skills related to internal quality assurance of higher education in higher education institutions. A distinctive feature of the course materials is the used experience of preparation and participation of Ukrainian HEIs in international projects and the formation of internal systems for ensuring the quality of educational activities in HEIs based on this experience.
Assessment methods and criteria: Laboratory classes
Practical training
Control work
Критерії оцінювання результатів навчання: 100–88 points – (“excellent”) is awarded for a high level of knowledge (some inaccuracies are allowed) of the educational material of the component contained in the main and additional recommended literary sources, the ability to analyze the phenomena being studied in their interrelationship and development, clearly, succinctly, logically, consistently answer the questions, the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 87–80 points – (“very good”) is awarded for knowledge of the educational material of the component above the average level, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions asked (a small number of inaccuracies are possible), the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 79–71 points – (“good”) is awarded for a generally correct understanding of the educational material of the component, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions, which, however, contain certain (insignificant) shortcomings, for the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical tasks; 70-61 points - ("mediocre") is awarded for mediocre knowledge of the educational material of the component, poorly reasoned answers, weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 60-50 points - ("satisfactory") awarded for weak knowledge of the component's educational material, inaccurate or poorly reasoned answers, with a violation of the sequence of presentation, for weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 49-26 points - ("unsatisfactory" with the possibility of retaking the semester control) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 25-00 points - ("unsatisfactory" with mandatory re-study) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to navigate when solving practical problems, ignorance of the main fundamental provisions.
Порядок та критерії виставляння балів та оцінок: 100–88 points – (“excellent”) is awarded for a high level of knowledge (some inaccuracies are allowed) of the educational material of the component contained in the main and additional recommended literary sources, the ability to analyze the phenomena being studied in their interrelationship and development, clearly, succinctly, logically, consistently answer the questions, the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 87–71 points – (“good”) is awarded for a generally correct understanding of the educational material of the component, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions posed, which, however, contain certain (insignificant) shortcomings, for the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical tasks; 70 – 50 points – (“satisfactory”) awarded for weak knowledge of the component’s educational material, inaccurate or poorly reasoned answers, with a violation of the sequence of presentation, for weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 49-26 points - ("not certified" with the possibility of retaking the semester control) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; 25-00 points - ("unsatisfactory" with mandatory re-study) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the component, significant errors in answering questions, inability to navigate when solving practical problems, ignorance of the main fundamental provisions.
Recommended books: 1. Міжнародні стандарти ESG2015 - 2015 р.
2. Віртуальне навчальне середовище:
1. Болонський процес та нова парадигма вищої освіти: монографія / Ю. М. Рашкевич. – Львів: Видавництво Львівської політехніки, 2014. – 168 с.
2. Розвиток системи забезпечення якості вищої освіти в Україні: інформаційно-аналітичний огляд / Укладачі: Добко Т., Золотарьова І., Калашнікова С., Ковтунець В., Курбатов С., Линьова І., Луговий В., Прохор І., Рашкевич Ю., Сікорська І., Таланова Ж., Фініков Т., Шаров С.; за заг. ред. С. Калашнікової та В. Лугового. – Київ : ДП «НВЦ «Пріоритети», 2015. – 84 с. https://erasmusplus.org.ua/korysna-informatsiia/korysni-materialy/category/3-materialy-natsionalnoi-komandy-ekspertiv-shchodo-zaprovadzhennia-instrumentiv-bolonskoho-protsesu.html?download=88:rozvytok-systemy-zabezpechennia-iakosti-vyshchoi-osvity-ukrainy
3. Імператив якості: вчимося цінувати і оцінювати вищу освіту: навч. посіб. / За ред. Т. Добка, М. Головянко, О. Кайкової, В. Терзіяна, Т. Тііхонена. – Львів: Видавництво «Компанія "Манускрипт"», 2014. – 572 с. http://dovira.eu/Trust_1.pdf
4. ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЯКОСТІ ВИЩОЇ ОСВІТИ: ЄВРОПЕЙСЬКІ КРАЩІ ПРАКТИКИ ДЛЯ УКРАЇНИ Упорядник: Тарас Добко - http://education-ua.org/ua/component/cck/?task=download&collection=blog_files_x&xi=0&file=blog_files&id=666
5. КОНЦЕПЦІЯ ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЯКОСТІ ВИЩОЇ ОСВІТИ УКРАЇНИ (ЗА РЕЗУЛЬТАТАМИ ПРОЕКТУ TEMPUS «TRUST» «НАЦІОНАЛЬНА СИСТЕМА ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ЯКОСТІ І ВЗАЄМНОЇ ДОВІРИ В СИСТЕМІ ВИЩОЇ ОСВІТИ УКРАЇНИ»1)“Towards Trust in Quality Assurance System” № 516935–TEMPUS–1–2011-1–
Допоміжна
6. FITEMPUS-SMGR, 15.10.2011–14.10.2014) [Електронний ресурс]. – Режим доступу: http://dovira.eu.