Technology of Critical Thinking Development

Major: Computer Science
Code of subject: 6.122.00.M.022
Credits: 3.00
Department: Department of Economics and Marketing
Lecturer: PhD, Senior Lecturer Kalinska O.P.
Semester: 3 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Мета вивчення дисципліни: The main goal of the course "Technology for the development of critical thinking": is to create conditions for the development of critical thinking in students. Achieving this goal is possible if: the training systematically includes tasks, the solution of which requires the mastery of complex mental operations; the educational process is organized as a sequential study of a certain topic, which is carried out in the process of their interactive interaction; the result of learning is not the assimilation of facts or other people's opinions, but the development of the ability to think, express one's own thoughts, assessments; teaching involves systematic assessment and correction of results using "student-teacher" feedback based on students' research activity in the classroom; training is focused on the development of students' sufficient skills of proof, analysis of arguments and formulation of conclusions supported by arguments; the ability to use graphic organizers in solving topical issues, to find, analyze and interpret information from various sources, to present the results of working with information in the form of various texts in oral and written forms; students are motivated to discuss problems and not shy away from solving them. They work together to reach a consensus, even if it is an "agreement to disagree." This ability to work together, to cooperate, is the most important condition for the development of critical thinking, as it promotes dialogue, the achievement of common goals, and the mutual exchange of values.
Завдання: Tasks of the academic discipline in accordance with the educational program. The study of an educational discipline involves the formation of competencies in students of education: general: Communication Autonomy and responsibility
Learning outcomes: Competencies that must be mastered by the student: general: 3. Basic general knowledge in the field of education 5. Skills of oral and written communication in the native language 8. Ability to self-study 9. Ability to adapt to new situations 10. Information skills (ability to find and analyze information from different sources) 12. Teamwork 16. Ability to work independently 18. Observance of ethics The learning outcomes of this discipline detail the following program learning outcomes: Knowledge and skills 1. Ability to think systematically and apply creative abilities to the formation of fundamentally new ideas, the creation of advanced technologies and various innovations. 6. Ability to search for information in various sources to solve problems of the specialty. 15. Ability to integrate and understand the content and logic of the knowledge system of the research area during training and further professional activity 17. Ability to think creatively in decision-making on the way to creating information systems. 18. Skills of written and oral presentation of scientific and practical material. 19. Ability to combine theory and practice, as well as to make decisions and develop a strategy for solving problems of the specialty, taking into account universal values, social, state and industrial interests. Communication 3. Obtaining knowledge for the organization of communication interaction and conflict resolution in the formation and implementation of software products, using modern information, communication and innovation technologies. Autonomy and responsibility 1. Ability to adapt to new situations and make appropriate decisions; 2. Ability to realize the need for lifelong learning in order to deepen the acquired and acquire new professional knowledge
Required prior and related subjects: logic
Summary of the subject: Theoretical foundations of critical thinking development technology. Basic characteristics and principles of critical thinking. Principles of active learning and critical thinking. Methods of developing critical thinking. Methods of developing critical thinking. Methodical model of critical thinking of cognitive process and its stage. Facts and opinions. Thought recognition. Criteria for distinguishing between opinions and facts. Mastering the skills of discussion and debate. Critical thinking and science. Features of the scientific text. Scientific text as a source of information. Techniques for manipulating the reader, listener. Information text. Persuasive text. Multiculturalism as a condition for the development of critical thinking. Critical thinking in civic education. Public relations: a modern view of the problem.
Опис: The educational discipline "Technology for the development of critical thinking" consists of sections: Theoretical foundations of technology for the development of critical thinking. Basic characteristics and principles of critical thinking. Principles of active learning and critical thinking. Methods of developing critical thinking. Methods of developing critical thinking. Methodical model of critical thinking of the cognitive process and its stages. Facts and opinions. Thought recognition. Criteria for distinguishing between opinions and facts. Mastering the skills and abilities of discussion and debate. Critical thinking and science. Peculiarities of the scientific text. Scientific text as a source of information. Techniques of manipulating the reader, the listener. Informational text. Persuasive text. Multiculturalism as a condition for the development of critical thinking. Critical thinking in civic education. Public relations: a modern view of the problem.
Assessment methods and criteria: - Current control (testing, independent work, essay) - 50 points; - Final control - 50 points
Критерії оцінювання результатів навчання: V protsesi navchannya zdobuvach povynen prodemonstruvaty aktyvnu navchal?nu diyal?nist? protyahom semestru i za rezul?tatamy potochnoho kontrolyu nabraty vid 28 do 40 baliv. Do obov?yazkovykh vydiv robit potochnoho kontrolyu vkhodyat?: 1. Testuvannya u VNS z 7 tem navchal?noyi dystsypliny, yaki otsinyuyut?sya maksymum v 2 baly: 7*2 = 14 baliv; 2. Vykonannya praktychnykh robit z rozmishchennyam u VNS, kozhna robota: 7*2 = 14 baliv. Vykonannya indyvidual?noho zavdannya za okremym variantom. Indyvidual?ne zavdannya otsinyuyet?sya v 22 baly, z yakykh 15 baliv za zmist i oformlennya zavdannya i maksymal?no 7 baliv za zakhyst. Krim toho zdobuvach mozhe otrymaty baly za aktyvnist? na zanyattyakh (Usne, frontal?ne opytuvannya), dopovidi na seminars?kykh zanyattyakh maksymal?no 1-2 baly. Okremo dodatkovymy balamy (vid 5 do 10 baliv) zaokhochuyet?sya zdobuvach do naukovo-poshukovoyi roboty – uchast? v konkursakh naukovo-poshukovykh robit, publikatsiyi naukovykh tez i statey. Na zaliku zdobuvach mozhe otrymaty maksymum 60 baliv. Zalik skladayet?sya z pys?movoyi ta usnoyi komponent. Riven?1 – testy 10 testiv*1 bal = 10 baliv. Riven? 2 – Daty vyznachennya ta rozkryty sut? ta zmist yavyshcha, ponyattya, daty vyznachennya, obgruntuvaty, 2 zavdannya*10 baliv =20 baliv. Riven? 3 – tvorche zavdannya (zakhyst kontrol?noyi roboty usno) – 30 baliv. Pid chas usnoho spilkuvannya z vykladachem zdobuvach mozhe otrymaty vid 0 do 30 baliv za vidpovid? na zapytannya. Показати більше 1 371 / 5 000 Результати перекладу Результат перекладу In the course of study, the applicant must demonstrate active educational activity during the semester and, based on the results of the current control, score from 28 to 40 points. Mandatory types of current control work include: 1. Testing at the National Academy of Sciences on 7 topics of the academic discipline, which are evaluated at a maximum of 2 points: 7*2 = 14 points; 2. Performance of practical work with placement in the National Emergency Service, each work: 7*2 = 14 points. Execution of an individual task according to a separate option. The individual task is evaluated in 22 points, of which 15 points are for the content and design of the task and a maximum of 7 points for the defense. In addition, the applicant can receive points for activity in classes (Oral, face-to-face interview), presentations at seminar classes, a maximum of 1-2 points. Separately, with additional points (from 5 to 10 points), the recipient is encouraged to research work - participation in competitions for research works, publication of scientific theses and articles. The winner can get a maximum of 60 points on the test. The assessment consists of a written and an oral component. Level 1 – tests 10 tests*1 point = 10 points. Level 2 – Define and reveal the essence and meaning of the phenomenon, concept, define, justify, 2 tasks*10 points = 20 points. Level 3 – a creative task (defense of the control work orally) – 30 points. During the oral communication with the teacher, the applicant can receive from 0 to 30 points for answering a question.
Порядок та критерії виставляння балів та оцінок: 100-88 points - certified with an “excellent” grade - High level: the student demonstrates an in-depth mastery of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the discipline, systematic knowledge, skills and abilities of their practical application. The mastered knowledge, skills and abilities provide the ability to independently formulate goals and organize learning activities, search and find solutions in non-standard, atypical educational and professional situations. The applicant demonstrates the ability to make generalizations based on critical analysis of factual material, ideas, theories and concepts, to formulate conclusions based on them. His/her activity is based on interest and motivation for self-development, continuous professional development, independent research activities, implemented with the support and guidance of the teacher. 87-71 points - certified with a grade of “good” - Sufficient level: involves mastery of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the discipline at an advanced level, conscious use of knowledge, skills and abilities to reveal the essence of the issue. Possession of a partially structured set of knowledge provides the ability to apply it in familiar educational and professional situations. Aware of the specifics of tasks and learning situations, the student demonstrates the ability to search for and choose their solution according to the given sample, to argue for the use of a particular method of solving the problem. Their activities are based on interest and motivation for self-development and continuous professional development. 70-50 points - certified with a grade of “satisfactory” - Satisfactory level: outlines the mastery of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the discipline at the average level, partial awareness of educational and professional tasks, problems and situations, knowledge of ways to solve typical problems and tasks. The applicant demonstrates an average level of skills and abilities to apply knowledge in practice, and solving problems requires assistance, support from a model. The basis of learning activities is situational and heuristic, dominated by motives of duty, unconscious use of opportunities for self-development. 49-00 points - certified with a grade of “unsatisfactory” - Unsatisfactory level: indicates an elementary mastery of the conceptual and categorical apparatus of the discipline, a general understanding of the content of the educational material, partial use of knowledge, skills and abilities. The basis of learning activities is situational and pragmatic interest.
Recommended books: 1. Vukina N.V. Critical thinking: how to teach it: scientific and methodical manual / N.V. Vukina, N.P. Dementievskaya, I.M. Sushchenko; for science. ed. O.I. Pometun. - Kharkiv: B.v., 2007. - 190 p. 2. Fundamentals of critical thinking. Methodical manual for teachers. Kiev 2009 3. Pometun E.I., I.M. Sushchenko, L.N.Pilipchatina, I.A. Baranova. Critical thinking for all: Self-teacher. - К., 2012. - 184 с. 4. Pometun O.I., Pylypchatina L.M., Sushchenko I.M., Baranova I.O. Fundamentals of critical thinking: A textbook for high school students. - Ternopil: Textbook - Bogdan, 2010. – 216p. 5. Halpern D. Psychology of critical thinking. St. Petersburg: Peter 2000.