Quality Control of Oil and Gas Facilities

Major: Oil and Gas Engineering and Technology
Code of subject: 6.185.01.E.084
Credits: 6.00
Department: Department of Oil and Gas Engineering and Welding
Lecturer: Biloborodchenko Volodymyr Ivanovych
Semester: 6 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Learning outcomes: The study of an academic discipline involves the formation and development of students' competencies: General: Knowledge of methods of operational control over the technical condition of technological equipment used in construction, repair, reconstruction and restoration of equipment and elements of the pipeline complex (ZH20). Specialists: The ability to perform an analysis of the technical condition and establish the required scope of quality control of pipeline systems. Plan current and capital repairs during the construction, repair, reconstruction and restoration of pipeline systems (FKP1.6). The learning outcomes of this discipline detail the following program learning outcomes: 1. The ability to analyze and formulate requirements for pipeline materials and coatings of pipeline systems. Choose optimal methods of quality control and coating (UM17). 2. Analyze the impact of initial indicators on the functional properties of pipelines, calculate and reasonably assign technical requirements for manufacturing accuracy, choose methods and means of control, systematically analyze and solve the main problems of product quality management (UM21).
Required prior and related subjects: Bachelor's degree disciplines Project management in production Surface engineering Mechanics of destruction of metal structures Study of physico-chemical and mechanical properties of welded joints, part 1 (PM)
Summary of the subject: During the study of the academic discipline, the student acquires theoretical and practical knowledge and skills in the use of physical principles in the implementation of methods of non-destructive quality control of oil and gas complex objects; equipment and materials for control; development of the basics of the technological process of quality control; justification of the choice of the control method for this product based on the evaluation of its defectoscopicity of the product, the adopted technology of its manufacture and the possibility of the occurrence of defects of various types and types during its implementation. The ability to evaluate the results of control, analyze the received defectoscopic information in order to create feedback between the cycles of production and control of products at various stages of their production to ensure and maintain a given level of product quality.
Assessment methods and criteria: Criteria for evaluating the learning outcomes of education seekers Maximum score in points Current control (PC) Examination control Together for discipline Together for PC Written component Oral component Defense of laboratory works in oral form by surveying the theoretical material on the topic of the work, research methodology and obtained results. 40 50 10 100 Total 40 50 10 100 Procedure and criteria for assigning points and grades: • 100-88 points - grade A ("excellent") is given for a high level of knowledge (some inaccuracies are allowed) of the educational material of the module contained in the main and additional recommended literary sources, the ability to analyze the phenomena being studied in their relationship and development, clearly, succinctly, logically, consistently answer the questions, the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; • 87–80 points – grade B (“very good”) is awarded for knowledge of the educational material of the module above the average level, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions asked (a small number of inaccuracies are possible), the ability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical tasks; • 79–71 points – grade C (“good”) is awarded for a generally correct understanding of the learning material of the module, including calculations, reasoned answers to the questions posed, which, however, contain certain (insignificant) shortcomings, for the ability to apply theoretical provisions during development solving practical problems; • 70–61 points - grade D ("mediocre") is given for mediocre knowledge of the module's educational material, poorly argued answers, weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; • 60–50 points – grade E (“satisfactory”) is given for weak knowledge of the module's educational material, inaccurate or poorly reasoned answers, with a violation of the sequence of presentation, for weak application of theoretical provisions when solving practical problems; • 49–26 points – the grade FX (“unsatisfactory”) with the possibility of retaking the exam or credit) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the module, significant errors in answering questions, inability to apply theoretical provisions when solving practical problems ; • 25–00 points – grade F (“unsatisfactory”) with mandatory re-study of the module) is awarded for ignorance of a significant part of the educational material of the module, significant errors in answering questions, inability to navigate when solving practical problems , ignorance of the main fundamental provisions.
Recommended books: 1. Quality control: textbook/ V.V. Chigarev, P.A. Havrysh, N.O. Makarenko.- Mariupil; DNVZ "PDTU", 2017-320p. 2. Bilokur I.P. Fundamentals of defectoscopy: textbook-K: "Azimuth-Ukraine", 2004-496p. 3. Bilokur I.P. Defectoscopy and non-destructive testing. K: Higher School, 1990-207p. 4. Yavorsky A.V. Welding quality control: lecture notes / A.V. Yavorskyi, V.D. Mindyuk .- Iv.-Frankivsk: IFNTUNG, 2006-114p. 5. Adamenko A.A. Modern methods of radiation defectoscopy.-K.: Nauk. Opinion, 1984-215p. 6. Volchenko V.N., Gurvych A.K., etc. Quarrel quality control./ Educational manual. - M.: Mashinostroenie, 1991.