Notary in Ukraine

Major: Law
Code of subject: 6.081.00.M.073
Credits: 6.00
Department: Civil Law and Procedure
Lecturer: Zabolotna N.Ya.
Semester: 6 семестр
Mode of study: денна
Learning outcomes: Program learning outcomes (LP): PR2. To carry out an analysis of social processes in the context of the analyzed problem and to demonstrate one's own vision of ways to solve it. PR4. Formulate your own reasoned judgments based on the analysis of a known problem. PR16. Explain the nature and content of the main legal phenomena and processes. PR17. Apply acquired knowledge in various legal situations, distinguish legally significant facts and form justified legal conclusions. PR19. Provide advice on possible ways to protect the rights and interests of clients in various legal situations. PR21. Know the mechanism of realization of human rights and freedoms. PR23. Analyze and correctly apply the norms of substantive and procedural law. Communication (COM): KOM 4. Explain the nature of certain events and processes with an understanding of the professional and social context. Autonomy and responsibility (AiV). AiV 3. The ability to take responsibility for the work performed, to make decisions independently, to achieve the set goal in compliance with the requirements of professional ethics; AiV 4. Ability to demonstrate understanding of current legislation.
Required prior and related subjects: Civil law, part 1 Civil process Labor Law Civil law, part 2
Summary of the subject: The purpose of the discipline is to acquaint future professionals with the role of notaries in the provision of notarial services, understanding the status and function of notaries in the rule of law, the system and tasks of notaries and notarial self-government, the general rules of notarial acts. To reveal the organizational bases of notarial activity, to acquaint with its tasks and principles, general principles of organization and functioning of notarial bodies in Ukraine.
Assessment methods and criteria: The semester evaluation for the academic discipline for full-time students consists of the sum of the evaluations of the current monitoring of the study results during the semester and the evaluation for the completion of the final credit control work. The maximum number of points for the final control is 100 points, of which 65 points are for the oral survey in practical classes and 35 points are the assessment for the performance of the final credit control work. Current control is carried out at each practical session and based on the results of independent work tasks. It provides for the evaluation of theoretical training of students of higher education on the specified topic (including self-developed material) during practical classes and the completion of essays. The maximum score for an oral survey in practical classes is 65 points, of which: 60 points are an oral survey of students in practical classes; 5 points - performance in practical classes with a report (abstract). All points obtained by the student in practical classes are added up. In the practical lessons of the discipline, the current control takes place by means of an oral survey of students. The student's oral answer to theoretical questions or his oral solution of a problem (assignment) on the topic of a practical lesson is evaluated on a scale from 4 to 0 points. Criteria for current assessment of students' knowledge in practical classes: 4 points - the student has a full command of the educational material, presents it freely independently and reasonedly during an oral presentation, deeply and comprehensively discloses the content of theoretical questions and practical tasks, using at the same time normative sources, judicial practice, mandatory and additional scientific literature. 3 points - the student has a sufficiently complete command of the educational material, explains it reasonably during oral presentations and written answers, mainly reveals the content of theoretical questions and practical tasks, but makes inaccuracies and minor mistakes when teaching individual questions, does not sufficiently use judicial practice when solving problems ( tasks). 2 points – the student generally possesses the educational material, but presents it fragmentarily and superficially (without argumentation and justification) during oral presentations and written answers, does not sufficiently reveal the content of theoretical questions and practical tasks (assignments), allowing inaccuracies in the argumentation of answers by normative sources and examples from court practice. 1 point - the student has a partial command of the educational material, is unable to explain the content of most of the questions of the topic during oral presentations and written answers, while making significant mistakes. 0 points - the student does not know the educational material and is unable to explain it, does not understand the content of theoretical questions and practical tasks. In practical classes, students can supplement answers, performances, which are evaluated separately. Answer additions are evaluated: 2 points - students who have a deep knowledge of the material, clearly defined its content; made a deep systematic analysis of the content of the speech, discovered new ideas and provisions that were not considered, but significantly affect the content of the report, provided their own arguments regarding the main provisions of this topic. 1 point - students who presented material on the discussed topic, which complements the content of the speech, deepens knowledge on this topic and expressed their own opinion, receive 1 point. At practical classes, students can also present a report in the form of an essay on a topic defined in the Methodological Guidelines for independent work. The maximum number of points for the preparation of an abstract and presentation of an abstract in a practical session is 5 points.
Recommended books: 1. Doly`ns`ka M. S. Notariat: pidruchny`k. L`viv. Liga-Pres. 2018. 398 s. 2. Doly`ns`ka M. S. Notarial`ny`j proces: pidruchny`k. L`viv: L`vivs`ky`j derzhavny`j universy`tet vnutrishnix sprav 2019. 652 s. 3 .Doly`ns`ka M. S., Markovy`ch X. M., Nimak M.O., Pavlyuk N.M. Notariat Ukrayiny`: teorety`chni ta prakty`chni zasady` funkcionuvannya: monografiya. L`viv: Insty`tut prava, psy`xologiyi ta innovacijnoyi osvity` Nacional`nogo universy`tetu «L`vivs`ka politexnika». L`viv: Vy`davny`cztvo «Rastr-7». 2019. 4. Doly`ns`ka M. S. Stanovlennya ta rozvy`tok pravovogo regulyuvannya notarial`noyi diyal`nosti v Ukrayini: monografiya. L.: L`vDUVS, 2015. – 988 s. 5. Doly`ns`ka M. S. Ukrayins`ke notarial`ne pravo. K.: Yurinkom Inter, 2015. 248 s. 6. Dyakovy`ch M.M. Xrestomatiya notarial`nogo prava Ukrayiny`: Navch. posibn. Isty`na, 2018. 480 s. 7. Komarov V.V., Barankova V.V. Notariat v Ukrayini: pidruchy`k. X.: Pravo, 2011. 384 s. 8. Notariat v Ukrayini: pidruchny`k: u 3 kn. 3-tye vy`d., dopovn. i pererobl. Kny`ga 1. Organizaciya notariatu z prakty`kumom / za zag. red. S. Ya. Fursy`. K.: Alerta, 2015. 484 s. 9. Nikitin Yu. V., By`chkova S. S., Chubenko A. G., Matvijchuk V. K., Gida E. O., Usty`menko T. P., Chuchkova N. O. Notariat v Ukrayini: navchal`ny`j posibny`k / Za zag. red.. Yu. V. Nikitina. K. : « Nacional`na akademiya upravlinnya»; «Alerta», 2016. 586 s. 10. Teoriya notarial`nogo procesu: Naukovo-prakty`chny`j posibny`k / Za zag. red. S. Ya. Fursy`. K.: Alerta; Centr uchbovoyi literatury`, 2012. 920 s.